Feature Comparison
| Feature | Churnkey | |
|---|---|---|
| Core Technology | ||
AI/ML-powered retries | Full support | Full support |
Per-merchant ML models | Full support | Partial |
Real-time diagnostics | Full support | Partial |
| Integrations | ||
Works with any PSP | Full support | Not supported |
No checkout changes required | Full support | Full support |
Multi-PSP orchestration | Full support | Not supported |
| Global Coverage | ||
Direct bank relationships | Full support | Not supported |
Global coverage | Full support | Partial |
| Features | ||
Dunning email campaigns | Full support | Full support |
Alternate card routing | Full support | Not supported |
3DS handling | Full support | Not supported |
| Pricing | ||
Performance-based pricing | Full support | Partial |
No setup fees | Full support | Full support |
No minimums | Full support | Partial |
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Works with any payment service provider
- No changes to existing checkout required
- 500+ direct bank relationships worldwide
- Real-time root cause diagnostics
- Transparent performance-based pricing
- Global coverage across 50+ countries
Cons
- Dunning campaigns available via partners only
- Alternate card routing depends on PSP capabilities
Pros
- Addresses voluntary AND involuntary churn
- Strong dunning features
- A/B testing built-in
- Good for holistic churn strategy
Cons
- Less technical recovery focus
- More outreach-dependent
- Subscription pricing (not performance-based)
- Payment recovery is secondary feature







